Saturday 7 September 2013

HISTORY OF RESTORATION DRAMA (GROUP 7)

HISTORY OF RESTORATION DRAMA

With Puritan reign in England, from 1642, the theatres of England remained closed. Plays were banned for the next eighteen years and although there was evasion of the law and underground playhouses like the ‘Red Bull’ continued to flourish, the period between 1642 and 1660 was mostly sans theatre.

In 1660 the Stuart dynasty was restored to the throne of England and with Charles II as king, the revival of theatre gradually came about. During his exile in France, he had enjoyed French theatre, and on his return to England, made sure theatre was restored. “Grasping the ideological value of the stage, Charles took an active interest in Restoration theatre from the start” Hence, as we see, one of the main factors that led to the success of Restoration theatre was the support of Charles II.

 In August, 1660, Charles II issued patents for two companies of actors and the performances began immediately. The period of Restoration was known as the renewal of British theatre and led by the companies of William Davenant and Thomas Killigrew, theatre in England was revived.

Due to the patents issued to them by the king, Killigrew and Davenant were given the right to build a theatre in London or Westminster and to establish and manage a company of actors to perform in it; Killigrew's actors were named the King's Company, and Davenant's were known as the Duke of York's. For a long time, these two companies monopolized theatre of the Restoration period.

~ Written by Srishti Banerjee (1313287)
Group 7










26 comments:

  1. The information you guys have put up are really good!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The sequencing is very appropriate and the topics covered are good as well , over all very nice .Could have been creative in presentation . This is ruchira

    ReplyDelete
  3. Its all very nicely done but it would have been a lot easier and engaging to read if it had all been compiled into one document.
    -Meghna Shekar (1313235)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice work .Informative .....but lacks order .It would have been nice if you presented the history first and use a mode for presentation .
    Christina Manuel(1313224)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Informative as well as put orderly in paragraphs. A few creative elements could have been included as well.
    - Keerthana 1313231

    ReplyDelete
  6. The article could have been combined in a single document for the better understanding. The work is impressive but lacks continuity and order.
    Aishwin Sahni 1313218

    ReplyDelete
  7. The entire thing is recorded in reverse order.. the history bit is hence the last part that I read, and so I'm a little confused.. also, there could've been a sort of link between the different parts, to make it easier to understand. However, each individual article is very well-written and thoroughly researched :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. The information for Group 7 was published a little haphazardly. A little of the information overlaps and that makes it easier to connect the different sections though. Overall, it was well written and researched.
    Mridula 1313238

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's really nice..the content. I think the whole thing could be organised in a better way.

    - 1313263

    ReplyDelete
  10. Compilation, compilation....
    -1313221 :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. The content for this is good, though it would have been excellent if all of them were in one place.
    - 1313216

    ReplyDelete
  12. well researched. informative.

    ReplyDelete
  13. GOOD RESEARCH..!! WELL WRITTEN SHRISTI BUT AGAIN...I TOOK REALLY LONG TO UNDERSTAND YOUR WORK..!! SHOULDVE HAVE BEEN ORGANISED

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well researched. Damn interesting.v(:

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1. Amazing Sketches :)
    2. I just felt a little less information, or information in some other form would've helped.
    But otherwise amazing :)

    ReplyDelete
  16. very informative, very nice. the drawings were really good. only thing is that you should have put everything up together.

    1313230

    ReplyDelete
  17. well written and very informative. only one complain though, the entire group could have compiled their work as one. that would make reviewing alot more easier.
    Akritee(1313270)

    ReplyDelete
  18. well written and informative...... i agree with akritee- the entire group should have posted it as one work....

    1313227

    ReplyDelete
  19. all the group 7 work from drawings to information is really good . i like that the required information in short and understandable manner is put up .. but it would have been more good for viewers if it was complied as one ..

    ReplyDelete
  20. Good research done but the group could have put up a better presentation and compiled all your works.
    Anupriya 1313273

    ReplyDelete
  21. Your work was really informative.congrats............the entire group equally participated.


    ANN MARIA.DAVIS
    1313272

    ReplyDelete
  22. informative..but a bit thick to grasp.. organized well

    ReplyDelete
  23. easily comprehensible. informative content. all in all a good read.

    ReplyDelete
  24. informative..it woukd have been better if all of the work has been put together
    1313258

    ReplyDelete